If He Were Coming: si veniret
If he were here: the imperfect subjunctive in both halves.
How It Works
| Latin | What is true |
|---|---|
| Si pecuniam haberem, villam emerem. If I had money, I would buy a house. | I have no money. |
| Si me amares, mecum maneres. If you loved me, you would stay with me. | You do not love me, or you are leaving. |
The imperfect speaks about the present here. Haberem means I had, and the whole sentence is about now.
The main part does not turn into a future. English would is part of the idea, and the Latin imperfect subjunctive carries it. A wish about the present uses the same tense: Utinam adesset (If only he were here).
Examples (5)
- Si Marcus adesset, Iulia rideret.
If Marcus were here, Iulia would be laughing.
Adesset and rideret are imperfect subjunctive. Marcus is not here.
- Si pecuniam haberem, villam emerem.
If I had money, I would buy a house.
Haberem and emerem are the imperfect subjunctive. I have no money.
- Si me amares, mecum maneres.
If you loved me, you would stay with me.
Amares and maneres are imperfect subjunctive, and the sentence describes the present.
- Si Latine scirem, libros Ciceronis legerem.
If I knew Latin, I would read the books of Cicero.
Scirem and legerem are imperfect subjunctive. I do not know Latin yet.
- Si sacerdos hic esset, missa celebraretur.
If the priest were here, Mass would be celebrated.
Esset and the passive celebraretur are imperfect subjunctive.
Common Mistakes
Making the main part a future after an unreal if-part.
Si pecuniam haberem, villam emam.Si pecuniam haberem, villam emerem.Both halves take the imperfect subjunctive. The English would does not turn the main verb into a future: emam would say I will buy.
How It Connects
Learn This First
A condition that is not true now uses the imperfect subjunctive.