Person in Subjunctive Clauses
In Hungarian, you cannot say "I want you to go." Instead, you must say "I want that you go," using a fully conjugated verb in the subjunctive mood. The embedded verb's ending tells us exactly who is supposed to perform the action.
How It Works
Understanding embedded subjunctive clauses is essential to become proficient in Hungarian complex sentences.
1. The Structural Difference from English
English frequently uses an object + infinitive construction for volition and desire (e.g., "I want him to read"). In Hungarian, verbs of permission (like hagy or enged) give you the choice of using either this object + infinitive construction or a hogy + subjunctive clause (e.g., Hagyom, hogy olvasson). However, for verbs of volition or request (like akar 'want', szeretné 'would like', or kér 'ask'), the object + infinitive construction is generally forbidden. Instead, when the subjects of the two verbs are different, you must create a finite subordinate clause introduced by hogy (that), and the embedded verb must be conjugated in the subjunctive mood (felszólító mód). If the subject of the main verb and the embedded action are the same (e.g., "I want to read"), Hungarian typically uses the infinitive (Akarok olvasni). However, while the infinitive is standard for simple same-subject volition, the hogy + subjunctive structure can still be used with the same subject for emphasis or contrast (e.g., Azt akarom, hogy ÉN olvassak), and it is extremely common in purpose clauses (e.g., Azért jöttem, hogy segítsek).
2. Person Agreement
The most critical nuance is that the embedded verb must agree with the person performing the action. If I want you to read it, the main verb is 1st person (akarom), but the embedded verb is 2nd person (elolvasd). Because Hungarian relies heavily on Subject Pronouns and Pro-Drop, the embedded verb's suffix is usually the only indicator of who the subject is. Adding explicit pronouns like ő or te in the embedded clause sounds unnaturally emphatic unless you are contrasting subjects.
3. Morphology and Assimilation
The subjunctive mood is marked by the consonant -j-. However, this marker is highly sensitive to the final consonant of the verb stem. It triggers complex phonological changes, especially Sibilant Assimilation in Verbs (e.g., olvas + j + a → olvassa) and changes with short-vowel -t ending stems (e.g., mutat + j + a → mutassa).
4. Subjunctive vs. Indicative
Learners often confuse when to use the indicative versus the subjunctive in hogy clauses. The rule is strict: use the indicative when the main verb states a fact, thought, or belief (Tudom, hogy mész - "I know that you are going"). Use the subjunctive when the main verb expresses influence, volition, or purpose (Akarom, hogy menj - "I want you to go"). See Mood Choice in Complements for more details.
5. Definiteness Across Clauses and the Pronoun Azt
Learners often wonder why the main verb and embedded verb might have different conjugations (e.g., akarom is definite, but menj is indefinite). The main verb is usually in the definite conjugation because the entire hogy-clause acts as its definite object. This is often signaled by the anticipatory dummy pronoun azt in the main clause (e.g., Azt akarom, hogy... - "I want [that], that..."). However, the embedded verb's definiteness depends entirely on its own object within the subordinate clause. See Clause Objects for more details.
6. Negation with Ne
When negating the embedded subjunctive clause, you must use ne instead of nem. For example, "I want you not to go" is Azt akarom, hogy ne menj el. This is a critical rule for all imperative and subjunctive structures.
7. Verbal Prefix Position
Unlike in direct commands, verbal prefixes (preverbs) typically stay attached to the front of the verb in affirmative embedded subjunctive clauses. For example, elolvas (to read completely) remains elolvasd in the clause: Azt akarom, hogy elolvasd ("I want you to read it"). They only separate if the clause is negated or focused. See Neutral Prefix Position for more on this behavior.
8. Tense Matching
A crucial rule to remember is that the Hungarian subjunctive only has one tense (present/non-past). English speakers often try to match past tenses (e.g., "I wanted him to read"), but in Hungarian, a past tense main verb still takes a present subjunctive embedded verb (e.g., Akartam, hogy elolvassa). The time reference is established entirely by the main clause.
Examples (4)
- Azt akarom, hogy elolvasd a könyvet.
I want you to read the book.
Word by Word: That I-want, that away-read-SUBJ-DEF-2SG the book-ACC.
The main verb 'akarom' is 1st person, but the embedded verb 'elolvasd' is 2nd person, showing that you are the one who should read it.
- Azért jöttem, hogy segítsek.
I came to help.
Word by Word: For-that I-came, that I-help-SUBJ-INDEF-1SG.
A purpose clause triggered by 'azért'. The embedded verb 'segítsek' is in the 1st person subjunctive, matching the subject of the main clause because the speaker is the one helping.
- A tanár azt mondta, hogy megírjuk a leckét.
The teacher said that we should do the homework.
Word by Word: The teacher that said, that PERF-we-write-SUBJ-DEF-1PL the homework-ACC.
An indirect command. The teacher spoke (3rd person), but we are the ones who must write, so 'megírjuk' is 1st person plural.
- Kérem, hogy kinyissa az ablakot.
I ask that you (formal) open the window.
Word by Word: I-ask, that out-open-SUBJ-DEF-3SG the window-ACC.
Formal requests use the 3rd person subjunctive form. Notice how the verbal prefix 'ki' stays attached to the front of the verb in an affirmative embedded clause.
Common Mistakes
The "Infinitive Mistake" (Direct English Translation)
Akarom téged menni.Akarom, hogy menj.English speakers frequently attempt to translate "I want you to [verb]" literally by using an accusative pronoun and an infinitive. Hungarian does not use this structure for verbs of volition. You must build a new clause with 'hogy' and conjugate the embedded verb in the subjunctive mood.
Agreement Mismatch
Azt akarom, hogy elolvasom a könyvet.Azt akarom, hogy elolvasd a könyvet.Learners sometimes mistakenly conjugate the embedded verb to match the subject of the main clause (e.g., "I want" -> 1st person embedded verb). The embedded verb must agree with its own subject—the person who is actually supposed to perform the action.
How It Connects
Learn This First
To understand person agreement in embedded imperative (subjunctive) clauses, a learner must first be familiar with the formation of the imperative mood and its person-specific endings. Additionally, they need to understand how 'hogy' (that) clauses function as the primary environment for these embedded structures.
- Indefinite Imperative
Understanding how the imperative agrees with subjects in person and number is necessary to recognize agreement in embedded clauses.
Level 2 - hogy (tárgyi mellékmondat)That-Clauses
Embedded imperative agreement typically occurs within subordinate clauses introduced by the conjunction 'hogy'.
Level 3
Related Patterns
- Mood Choice in Complements
Explains the critical distinction between using the indicative for facts and the subjunctive for influence in 'hogy' clauses.
Level 5 - -jImperative and Subjunctive
Covers the foundational morphology of the subjunctive/imperative mood used in these embedded clauses.
Level 2 - Sibilant Assimilation in Verbs
Crucial for correctly conjugating the embedded verbs, as the '-j-' mood marker frequently assimilates with the stem's final consonant.
Level 2 - hogy (célhatározói mellékmondat)Purpose Clauses
Purpose clauses are one of the most common triggers for this embedded subjunctive agreement pattern.
Level 3 - Subject Pronouns and Pro-Drop
Explains why explicit pronouns are omitted in these embedded clauses, relying entirely on the verb's person agreement to identify the subject.
Level 1