kāore i ... engari
Correcting a Statement
Past action: kāore + subject + i + verb, engari + affirmative clause.
How It Works
For an earlier action, form the denial as kāore + subject + i + verb. Follow it with engari and the contrasting affirmative clause, normally in predicate-first order. Objects retain their usual marking. Neither clause adds person or number endings to its verb.
Kāore a Hemi i oma, engari i hīkoi ia corrects the action: Hemi walked instead of running. The bread-and-milk example corrects the object. A location contrast uses a different negative structure: Kāore ngā tamariki i te kura, engari kei te kāinga rātou. Here i introduces the denied location and does not mark past time. Compare the same initial negative shape with a following verb: its interpretation depends on the predicate. Engari can correct a mistaken claim or contrast two facts; context supplies that distinction.
Examples (3)
- Kāore a Hemi i oma, engari i hīkoi ia.
Hemi didn’t run, but walked.
Contrasts earlier actions.
- Kāore au i hoko i te taro, engari i hoko au i te miraka.
I didn’t buy the bread, but bought the milk.
Both clauses preserve object marking.
- Kāore ngā tamariki i te kura, engari kei te kāinga rātou.
The children aren’t at school, but are at home.
A present-location correction.
How It Connects
Learn This First
Join a denial to its corrective or contrasting affirmative claim. Identify whether the correction concerns an action, object or location, and preserve the construction required by each clause.
- kāore ... iNegating an Earlier Action
The past negative supplies the subject-before-verb denial used to correct running and buying claims.
Level 2 - engariJoining a Contrast
Its corrective location example already shows how contrasting clauses preserve their own predicate structures.
Level 2 - kāore ... i koneiNegating a Location
Negative location syntax explains why the school-and-home correction can concern present location despite its i phrase.
Level 2