Time Across Two Clauses
A past main verb does not automatically require a past dependent verb.
How It Works
An affirmative dependent clause with its own subject normally uses full subjunctive forms for present or future reference. The relevant forms of yahay and leeyahay match ordinary present forms. A relative whose head supplies its subject uses reduced forms.
After a past report, in ay Sahra macallimad tahay can describe Sahra as a teacher at the reporting time. With ahayd, an earlier-status reading is available. Neither construction establishes her occupation now. Dependent past often indicates precedence, rather than invariably doing so.
In Waxaan arkay wiil jiifa ‘I saw a boy who was lying down’, reduced present jiifa describes the boy at the past moment of seeing.
Temporal clauses have a further contrast: progressive marka aan cuntada karinayo presents overlapping cooking; simple marka aan cuntada kariyo can present completed cooking before another action begins. Specific past temporal clauses also use ordinary past forms. Negative dependent forms leave present-versus-past interpretation to context.
Examples (5)
- Waxaan maqlay in ay Sahra macallimad tahay.
I heard that Sahra was a teacher.
The intended status overlaps the hearing.
- Waxaan maqlay in ay Sahra macallimad ahayd.
I heard that Sahra had been a teacher.
This gives the intended earlier-status reading.
- Waxaan arkay wiil jiifa.
I saw a boy who was lying down.
The relative present describes a simultaneous past circumstance.
- Marka aan cuntada karinayo, telefoonka ma isticmaalo.
While I am cooking the food, I do not use the phone.
The progressive establishes overlap.
- Marka aan cuntada kariyo, waan nasan doonaa.
When I have cooked the food, I will rest.
Cooking is presented as completed before resting.
How It Connects
Learn This First
Recognize complement and temporal clauses, past agreement and the full-versus-reduced relative distinction before interpreting overlap, precedence and completion from the main event’s viewpoint.
- in + clauseEmbedding a Statement with in
Recognize complement and temporal clauses, past agreement and the full-versus-reduced relative distinction before interpreting overlap, precedence and completion from the main event’s viewpoint.
Level 3 - markaWhen and Whenever
Recognize complement and temporal clauses, past agreement and the full-versus-reduced relative distinction before interpreting overlap, precedence and completion from the main event’s viewpoint.
Level 3 - Completed Past Events
Recognize complement and temporal clauses, past agreement and the full-versus-reduced relative distinction before interpreting overlap, precedence and completion from the main event’s viewpoint.
Level 2 - oo + relative clauseAdding a Relative Description
Recognize complement and temporal clauses, past agreement and the full-versus-reduced relative distinction before interpreting overlap, precedence and completion from the main event’s viewpoint.
Level 3
Related Patterns
Learn Next
Patterns that build on this one.