għax

Giving a Reason

Level 2

Main claim + għax + reason.

How It Works

Għax typically introduces a reason clause. A straightforward pattern states the main claim first and then gives its explanation. The connector is invariant. The reason's predicate keeps the agreement, tense, aspect, and polarity appropriate to its own situation.

Xtrajt ħobż għax ma kellix ħobż id-dar, “I bought bread because I had no bread at home,” combines an affirmative action with a negative past reason. A reason can also be descriptive: It-tfal qed jidħku għax il-logħba divertenti, “The children are laughing because the game is entertaining.” The reason has no overt present copular verb.

A current situation can explain a future decision. Compare għax ma kellix ħobż, “because I had no bread,” with biex nixtri ħobż, “to buy bread.” The first explains the action; the second states its goal.

Examples (3)

  1. Xtrajt ħobż għax ma kellix ħobż id-dar.

    I bought bread because I had no bread at home.

    A negative past reason explains an affirmative action.

  2. It-tfal qed jidħku għax il-logħba divertenti.

    The children are laughing because the game is entertaining.

    The reason is a present descriptive clause.

  3. Se nibqgħu hawn għax qed tagħmel ix-xita.

    We will stay here because it is raining.

    A current situation explains a future decision.

How It Connects

Tap a pattern to see what it builds on and what it leads to.

għaxLevel 2Giving a Reason

Learn This First

Link a claim to its explanation while retaining the reason's independently appropriate time, aspect, and polarity. The concrete examples distinguish an existing explanatory circumstance from an intended goal.

Learn Next

Patterns that build on this one.