Past Conditional for 'Future in the Past'
In Italian, when you talk about the past and want to mention something that was 'going to happen' later, you use the condizionale passato (Past Conditional).
How It Works
The condizionale passato per futuro nel passato is the standard way to express 'posteriority' (an action happening later) when the main verb is already in a past tense.
1. Formation:
It is formed using the present conditional of the auxiliary verb (essere or avere) followed by the past participle of the main verb.
- Sarei andato (I would go / I was going to go)
- Avrei mangiato (I would eat / I was going to eat)
2. Usage Context & The 'Subjunctive Trap':
This pattern typically appears in subordinate clauses after verbs of saying, thinking, or knowing in the past (e.g., dire, sapere, pensare, credere). In this construction, the main verb must be in a past tense like the passato prossimo, imperfetto, or passato remoto.
Important Note: You might have learned that verbs like pensare and credere trigger the subjunctive. However, because Italian does not have a 'future subjunctive' tense, the past conditional overrides the subjunctive rule to express a future-in-the-past action (e.g., Pensavo che saresti venuto — I thought you would come).
3. Direct vs Indirect Speech:
A great way to understand this rule is by looking at how direct speech transforms into indirect (reported) speech. When a direct quote uses the future tense, it changes to the past conditional when reported in the past:
- Direct Speech: Marco ha detto: "Lo farò io." (Marco said: "I will do it.")
- Indirect Speech: Marco ha detto che lo avrebbe fatto lui. (Marco said that he would do it.)
4. Same-Subject Rule (Implicit Clauses):
When the subject of the main clause and the subordinate clause are the same, Italian standardly drops che and uses di + present infinitive instead of the past conditional. For example, Pensavo di vincere (I thought I would win) is preferred over Pensavo che avrei vinto.
5. Register and Alternatives:
While the past conditional is the standard choice, there are three important variations:
- The 'Still Future' Exception: If the action is still in the future relative to the moment you are speaking, the futuro semplice is often preferred for clarity (e.g., Mi ha detto che verrà domani — He told me he will come tomorrow).
- The Imperfetto di Posteriorità: In informal speech, but also in journalism and narrative literature to create a sense of immediacy, the imperfetto indicativo is frequently used (e.g., Mi ha detto che veniva instead of sarebbe venuto).
- Dovere + Infinitive: In spoken Italian, the imperfect of dovere followed by an infinitive is also a common alternative (e.g., Mi ha detto che doveva partire — He told me he was going to leave).
6. Important Distinction:
Unlike the 'counterfactual' use of the condizionale passato (where an action didn't happen), in this 'future in the past' context, the action might have actually occurred; the tense simply marks the chronological order of events from a past perspective.
Examples (5)
- Sapevo che Mara avrebbe telefonato per scusarsi.
I knew that Mara would call to apologize.
Word by Word: I knew that Mara would have phoned for to excuse herself.
The main verb 'sapevo' is in the past, so the future action 'would call' must be expressed with the past conditional 'avrebbe telefonato'.
- Il meteo aveva previsto che sarebbe piovuto.
The weather forecast had predicted it would rain.
Word by Word: The weather had predicted that it would have rained.
Since the prediction happened in the past, the 'future' rain is expressed using 'sarebbe piovuto'.
- Gli domandò cosa avrebbe fatto il giorno dopo.
He asked him what he would do the next day.
Word by Word: To him he asked what he would have done the day after.
In an indirect question set in the past, the future action uses the past conditional.
- Ero sicuro che saresti venuto alla festa.
I was sure that you would come to the party.
Word by Word: I was sure that you would have come to the party.
The verb 'venire' uses 'essere' as an auxiliary, so we use 'saresti' + 'venuto'.
- Pensavo che avresti finito il lavoro entro sera.
I thought you would finish the work by evening.
Word by Word: I thought that you would have finished the work within evening.
The thought occurred in the past, referring to a completion that was still in the future at that time.
Common Mistakes
Using the present conditional instead of the past conditional.
Ha detto che verrebbe domani.Ha detto che sarebbe venuto il giorno dopo.English speakers often translate 'would come' directly to 'verrebbe'. However, in Italian, if the main verb is past ('ha detto'), you must use the past conditional ('sarebbe venuto') to show the future.
Using the present for a later event after a past verb.
Sapevo che vince.Sapevo che avrebbe vinto.After a past verb like 'sapevo', a later event is shown with the past conditional. 'Avrebbe vinto' here means 'was going to win', not 'would have won but did not'.
How It Connects
Learn This First
To express a 'future in the past' in Italian, you need to understand how reported speech functions when the main verb is in the past. Structurally, this requires a good grasp of the past conditional (condizionale passato) and an understanding of how past tenses like the imperfect set the timeframe for the reported action.
Related Patterns
- Imperfect Tense
In informal speech, the imperfect indicative often replaces the past conditional to express the future in the past.
Level 2 - Passato Prossimo vs Imperfetto
Understanding past tenses is essential because they serve as the 'anchor' that triggers the need for the past conditional.
Level 2 - Present Conditional (Regular)
The present conditional forms the first part (the auxiliary) of the past conditional construction.
Level 2 - Past Participle Agreement with 'essere'
When using 'essere' as the auxiliary in the past conditional, the past participle must agree in gender and number with the subject.
Level 2
Learn Next
Patterns that build on this one.