Choosing nominal or verbal clauses

Level 5

Nominal style turns actions into nouns (e.g., 'the building') for formal cohesion, while verbal style uses active or passive verbs (e.g., 'to build') for dynamic narrative.

How It Works

In Indonesian, the choice between nominal and verbal clauses is a matter of register, cohesion, and lexical density.

1. Nominal Style (Gaya Nominal)
This style relies on nominalization—turning verbs or adjectives into nouns primarily using affixes like peN-...-an, per-...-an, or ke-...-an. Generally, there is a morphological correlation: verbs with the meN- prefix become peN-...-an nouns (indicating processes), while verbs with the ber- prefix become per-...-an nouns (which indicate events, results of actions like pertanyaan, or locations/collectives like perkampungan). To see this contrast on a single root, compare satu (one): menyatukan (to unite) becomes penyatuan (the process of uniting), while bersatu (to be united) becomes persatuan (the state of unity or an association). Crucially, when a verb ending in the suffix -kan or -i is nominalized with peN-...-an, the suffix is dropped (e.g., menyatukan becomes penyatuan, not penyatukanan). Note that the per-...-an circumfix undergoes the same regular morphophonemic spelling changes as the ber- prefix (e.g., dropping the 'r' before roots with 'er' as in bekerja -> pekerjaan, or changing to 'pel-' as in belajar -> pelajaran). Crucially, the N in peN-...-an has nasal alternations broadly parallel to those as the meN- prefix (e.g., tulis -> penulisan, baca -> pembacaan). To complete the picture, contrast this process noun with the simple suffix -an, which forms nouns representing the result, object, or instrument of an action (e.g., tulisan means the written work itself, and bacaan means reading material). Finally, the circumfix ke-...-an forms nouns from several classes of bases (e.g., bebas -> kebebasan). Its meanings also include events, so it is not a universal state-versus-process opposition to peN-...-an and per-...-an.

  • Function: It increases lexical density, packing more information into fewer clauses. This is achieved mechanically by shifting from conjunctions linking full clauses (verbal style, e.g., karena harga naik) to prepositions linking noun phrases (nominal style, e.g., akibat kenaikan harga). It lets a writer refer to an action as a topic or participant. This can support cohesion, but does not establish the truth of the event or require omitting its actor.
  • Argument Structure: When an active transitive verb is nominalized, its object usually attaches directly to the nominalized word as a noun phrase modifier (e.g., pembuatan kue). Prepositions like terhadap or atas are grammatically standard for introducing the object of an abstract nominalization (e.g., penolakan terhadap RUU). To include both the object and the actor, two useful patterns are: 1) Nominalization + Object + oleh + Actor (e.g., pembuatan kue oleh ibu-ibu), and 2) Nominalization + Actor + terhadap + Object (e.g., penolakan presiden terhadap RUU).
  • Negation: Nominal concepts are typically negated using ketidak-...-an (e.g., ketidakmampuan), tidak adanya + noun, or by retaining tidak inside a -nya nominalization (e.g., tidak meningkatnya harga). If a nominalized word acts as the predicate of a sentence, it must be negated with bukan (e.g., Ini bukan penolakan, melainkan penundaan).
  • Context: High-level formal writing, government reports, and academic papers.

2. Verbal Style (Gaya Verbal)
This style uses active meN- verbs or di- passive forms.

  • Function: It emphasizes the progression of events or the action itself. While active forms highlight the actor, passive forms focus on the patient or the result. It is the direct and standard way to communicate actions.
  • Negation: These clauses are negated with tidak.
  • Context: Daily conversation, fiction, and standard instructions where clarity and directness are preferred.

3. The '-nya' Pattern
A common formal technique is using -nya to nominalize a verb (e.g., Meningkatnya...), which allows the writer to present a cause-and-effect relationship efficiently. Crucially, this pattern requires a strict word order: in this model the subject of the underlying predicate follows the predicate bearing -nya; the suffix does not automatically mean possession (Verb-nya + Subject, e.g., Meningkatnya harga beras... = the rising of rice prices, not Harga beras meningkatnya...).

Examples (5)

  1. Pemerintah sedang membangun jembatan baru.

    The government is building a new bridge.

    Word by Word: Government [progressive] build bridge new.

    Verbal Style: Uses the active verb 'membangun'. The actor (government) and the action are clear and dynamic.

  2. Pembangunan jembatan itu akan selesai tahun depan.

    The building of that bridge will be finished next year.

    Word by Word: Building bridge that will finish year front.

    Pembangunan names the building project or process as the subject. Akan selesai describes its future completion; the noun does not make the event static.

  3. Menurunnya harga minyak dunia berdampak pada ekonomi.

    The decrease in world oil prices has an impact on the economy.

    Word by Word: Decreasing-nya price oil world have-impact on economy.

    Nominalized Clause: Using '-nya' to turn the verb 'menurun' into a subject noun phrase, common in news reporting.

  4. Dia datang terlambat. Keterlambatannya membuat guru marah.

    He/she arrived late. His/her lateness made the teacher angry.

    Word by Word: He/she come late. Lateness-his/her make teacher angry.

    Cohesion: The second sentence uses a nominalized form (keterlambatan) to refer back to the action in the first sentence.

  5. Pelaksanaan pemantauan pembangunan sedang dilakukan.

    The implementation of the monitoring of the construction is being done.

    Word by Word: Implementation monitoring construction [progressive] [passive]-do.

    Several nominalizations are stacked here. This is grammatical, but a reader may need more context to distinguish implementation, monitoring, and construction. The actor is not named; an oleh phrase or a separate clause could identify it.

Common Mistakes

  • Using 'tidak' instead of 'bukan' to negate a nominalized predicate.

    Keputusan ini tidak penolakan terhadap usulan Anda.
    Keputusan ini bukan penolakan terhadap usulan Anda.

    When a verb is nominalized (turned into a noun like 'penolakan'), it functions as a noun. If it acts as the predicate of the sentence, you must negate it with 'bukan', not 'tidak'.

  • Using an unmarked repeated clause as the intended subject noun phrase.

    Dia gagal. Dia gagal itu sangat menyedihkan.
    Dia gagal. Kegagalannya itu sangat menyedihkan.

    For the intended subject his/her failure, use Kegagalannya itu. Nominalization is one cohesive option, not a professional-writing requirement: Dia gagal. Hal itu sangat menyedihkan is another clear structure.

How It Connects

Tap a pattern to see what it builds on and what it leads to.

Choosing nominal or verbal clausesLevel 5

Learn Next

Patterns that build on this one.