Historical Infinitive Syntax
In Old and Middle Hungarian, speakers could say the equivalent of 'I want my going' (akarom mennem) instead of 'I want to go' (akarok menni).
How It Works
In modern Hungarian, inflected infinitives are strictly limited to impersonal, evaluative, or modal predicates (like kell or lehet). Common modern examples include Haza kell mennem (I have to go home), Itt lehet aludnotok (You guys can sleep here), and Nincs mit tennünk (There is nothing for us to do). However, in Old and Middle Hungarian, they could be used as complements to standard, subject-agreeing matrix verbs (e.g., akar, kezd, lát).
Morphological Rules:
- The suffixes attach to the verb stem via the infinitive marker -ni. Verbs ending in two consonants, a long vowel followed by -t (e.g., fűt, tanít, bocsát), or specific exceptions like véd and edz require a linking vowel before the infinitive marker (e.g., segít → segíteni → segítenem). However, lát is a notable exception to the long vowel + -t rule and attaches -ni directly (látni). Similarly, verbs ending in -ll or -rr (e.g., áll, száll, varr, forr) are exceptions and attach the -ni marker directly without a linking vowel (e.g., állni → állnom).
- Irregular verbs build these forms on their specific infinitive stems, not the present tense dictionary stem (e.g., megy → menni → mennem).
- Crucially, the -i of the infinitive marker is dropped before 1st and 2nd person suffixes (e.g., mennem, látnod).
- The -i is retained in the 3rd person (e.g., mennie, látniuk).
- The 1st/2nd person singular and 2nd person plural are subject to Three-Way Suffix Harmony (e.g., 1st person singular is -nom / -nem / -nöm). The 3rd person singular (-nia/-nie), 1st person plural (-nunk/-nünk), and 3rd person plural (-niuk/-niük) only have two-way Vowel Harmony.
Full Paradigm Example (látni):
- 1st sg: látnom
- 2nd sg: látnod
- 3rd sg: látnia
- 1st pl: látnunk
- 2nd pl: látnotok
- 3rd pl: látniuk
Dative Subjects, Prefix Splitting & Negation:
The logical subject of an inflected infinitive takes the Dative Case (-nak/-nek or dative pronouns like nekem, neked, neki, nekik). For example: Jánosnak mennie kell (János has to go) or Nekem látnom kell (I have to see). Because the infinitive is inflected for person, the dative pronoun is usually dropped unless used for emphasis or contrast. Crucially, when a plural dative subject is explicitly stated (e.g., a gyerekeknek), the inflected infinitive typically takes the 3rd person singular ending to avoid redundancy (e.g., A gyerekeknek haza kell mennie), similar to possessive noun phrases. Furthermore, when an inflected infinitive with a verbal prefix is used with a modal like kell, the prefix detaches and jumps in front of the modal (e.g., el kell mennem), following the rules of Prefix Climbing with Kell. When negating these constructions, the negative word nem is placed before the modal or impersonal verb, not the infinitive (e.g., Nem kell mennem = I don't have to go).
Register & Possessive Connection:
The Old Hungarian syntax of using these with standard matrix verbs is highly archaic and obsolete, encountered exclusively in historical texts, old hymns, or highly stylized literary texts. However, the morphological forms themselves are very much alive and used daily with impersonal, evaluative, or modal verbs. It is a common misconception that these are 'verb endings'; authoritative linguistic sources emphasize that they are morphologically identical to Type II possessive suffixes, reflecting the historically nominal nature of the Hungarian infinitive. Comparing noun possessive suffixes to inflected infinitives makes this clear: a kutyám (my dog) vs. látnom (my seeing); a kutyád (your dog) vs. látnod (your seeing). Recognizing this connection significantly reduces the memorization burden.
Examples (3)
- Hadd lássak én mennem.
Let me see myself go. / Let me be able to walk the path.
Word by Word: Let see-I I go-my.
A 16th-century hymn example showing the 1st person singular inflected infinitive 'mennem' used with the active verb 'lássak'.
- Kezdének sírniok.
They began to cry.
Word by Word: Began-they cry-their.
From an Old Hungarian codex. The 3rd person plural suffix retains the 'i' of the infinitive marker (archaically -niok, modern -niuk).
- Akarom tennem.
I want to do it.
Word by Word: Want-I-it do-my.
A historical subject control pattern where the infinitive takes a possessive suffix despite the main verb already agreeing with the subject.
Common Mistakes
Overgeneralizing the modern inflected infinitive to standard control verbs.
Akarom csinálnom.Akarom csinálni.While 'akarom csinálnom' was grammatical in Old Hungarian, it is strictly ungrammatical today. Modern Hungarian requires a bare infinitive for subject control with active verbs.
Failing to drop the '-i' of the infinitive marker in the 1st and 2nd persons.
Mennim kell.Mennem kell.Whether in archaic texts or modern impersonal constructions, the 'i' of the '-ni' suffix must be dropped before 1st and 2nd person possessive endings.
How It Connects
Learn This First
To understand archaic possessive infinitive constructions, you must first be comfortable with how modern Hungarian inflects infinitives for person and how possessive suffixes function. These historical patterns often extend the logic of dative-marked subjects and possessive morphology to a wider range of verbs and contexts than is found in contemporary neutral speech.
- Inflected Infinitives
Archaic constructions rely heavily on inflected infinitives, which are the foundation for these historical structures.
Level 2 - Marked Possessor
Historical infinitive constructions often involve dative-marked subjects or possessors, similar to the modern 'nekem kell' or 'nekem van' structures.
Level 2
Related Patterns
- Infinitive Subject Control
Shows how modern Hungarian handles the exact same syntactic situations (using bare infinitives instead of inflected ones).
Level 4 - -m/-d/-a/-eSingular Possessors
Provides the morphological foundation for the endings used on the infinitive, proving its historical status as a possessed noun.
Level 1