Deep embedding of subordinate clauses
Deep embedding (l'enchâssement) occurs when a sentence contains multiple layers of subordinate clauses. While basic embedding is common in daily speech, deep nesting is a tool for formal writing to link complex ideas within a single thought.
How It Works
Deep embedding, or l'enchâssement (also referred to as l'emboîtement), allows for a hierarchical organization of information. To become proficient in this structure, one must respect specific syntactic rules.
1. Structural Hierarchy and Register
Basic embedding (1-2 levels) is common in all registers (e.g., 'Je sais que tu viens' - 'I know that you are coming'). Chaining three or more clauses is also very common in everyday speech (e.g., 'Je crois qu'il a dit qu'il voulait que tu viennes' - 'I believe he said he wanted you to come'). It is only excessive or clumsy embedding, known as style lourd (heavy style), that writers try to avoid. To fix deep clause chaining, one must usually use an infinitive transformation, rewrite, or break up the sentence. This is distinct from having a 'heavy subject' (sujet lourd) inside a single embedded clause, which can sometimes be resolved using stylistic inversion.
2. Mandatory Subordinators
French is much stricter than English regarding subordinators. You cannot omit them (unlike the English 'that'). While que is very common, subordinators also include relative pronouns (like qui, dont, où) and other conjunctions (like quand or parce que). In coordinated structures, repeating the subordinator after 'et' or 'ou' is standard for 'que', but for other conjunctions like 'quand', 'lorsque', 'puisque', or 'comme', they are generally replaced by 'que' rather than repeated. Always remember elision (qu') before vowels.
3. Coordinating Subordinate Clauses with 'Que'
A standard rule in complex embedding occurs when coordinating two subordinate clauses introduced by conjunctions like si, quand, lorsque, puisque, or comme. Instead of repeating the conjunction, the second clause is introduced by que. The mood of the verb depends on the original conjunction: 'si... et que' traditionally takes the subjunctive (e.g., 'Si tu viens et que tu sois en retard...' - 'If you come and you are late...'), though the indicative is also admitted and correct (note that strict teachers and standardized tests often treat the indicative here as an error, so the subjunctive is heavily preferred in formal writing and exams). However, 'quand/puisque... et que' retains the indicative (e.g., 'Quand il pleut et qu'il fait froid...' - 'When it rains and it is cold...'). If the original conjunction already requires the subjunctive (e.g., bien que, pour que), the coordinated que naturally retains the subjunctive.
4. Mood Selection and 'Attraction Modale'
Normally, each verb's mood is determined by its direct parent. However, in advanced French, attraction modale may occur. This is when a nested clause 'catches' the subjunctive from a higher clause because it shares the same 'subjective thought' or uncertainty, even if its own trigger would normally require the indicative. For example, in 'Il faut que tu trouves une excuse qui soit crédible', the verb soit is in the subjunctive by modal attraction to the subjunctive trouves.
5. The 'Ne Explétif' in Nested Clauses
In advanced embedding, you will frequently encounter the ne explétif. When a higher clause expresses fear or prevention, this non-negative 'ne' often appears in the subordinate subjunctive clause, even when nested deeply (e.g., 'Je sais qu'elle craint que tu ne viennes' - 'I know that she fears that you might come'). Note that expressions of prevention also trigger it in complex chains (e.g., 'Il a fermé la porte pour éviter que le chien ne sorte quand tu arriveras' - 'He closed the door to prevent the dog from getting out when you arrive').
6. The Infinitive Transformation
To avoid overly deep embedding, French strongly prefers or requires an infinitive construction when the subject of the main clause and the subordinate clause are the same. For example, instead of a heavy chain like 'Il dit qu'il pense qu'il partira', you would use 'Il dit qu'il pense partir' ('He says that he thinks he will leave').
7. Avoiding 'Cascades de que'
A well-known stylistic flaw is the 'cascade de que'—repeating 'que' across multiple nested levels, which makes sentences heavy and hard to read. Writers avoid this by using nominalization, infinitives, or restructuring the sentence.
8. Sequence of Tenses (Concordance des temps)
A critical rule for deep embedding is the sequence of tenses. The tense of the subordinate clause is strictly dictated by the tense of the main clause. When the main clause is in a past tense, it forces tense shifts in the embedded clauses (e.g., present becomes imperfect, future becomes conditional).
9. Usage
This pattern is primarily found in legal texts, academic essays, and classical literature where complex logical relationships must be maintained within a single period.
10. Subjunctive in Relative Clauses after Superlatives
When a nested relative clause follows a superlative or an absolute term, it often requires the subjunctive to express subjectivity or a personal judgment, even at the end of a long chain (e.g., 'Je crois que c'est le meilleur livre que j'aie jamais lu' - 'I believe that it is the best book I have ever read'). You can review this in subjunctive after a superlative.
Examples (4)
- Je ne pense pas qu'il sache que nous sommes arrivés.
I don't think he knows that we have arrived.
Word by Word: I not think not that he knows (subj.) that we are arrived.
Here, 'sache' is in the subjunctive because of 'Je ne pense pas que', but 'sommes' remains in the indicative because 'savoir que' usually takes the indicative.
- C'est un homme qui pense que tout ce qu'il dit est vrai.
He is a man who thinks that everything he says is true.
Word by Word: It is a man who thinks that all that which he says is true.
This shows a relative clause ('qui pense...') containing a noun clause ('que tout...'), which in turn contains another relative clause ('qu'il dit').
- Bien qu'il sache que tu croies qu'il a tort, il continue.
Although he knows that you believe he is wrong, he continues.
Word by Word: Although he knows (subj.) that you believe (subj.) that he has wrong, he continues.
This demonstrates 'attraction modale'. 'Croies' is subjunctive here because it is nested under the subjunctive 'sache', even though 'savoir que' normally triggers the indicative.
- Il a dit qu'il viendrait si le travail qu'il doit finir est terminé.
He said that he would come if the work he must finish is finished.
Word by Word: He has said that he would come if the work that he must finish is finished.
A complex chain involving reported speech, a condition, and a relative clause.
Common Mistakes
Omitting the subordinator in nested layers or incorrectly repeating conjunctions other than 'que'.
Je pense il dit il a faim et il veut manger.Je pense qu'il dit qu'il a faim et qu'il veut manger.In English, 'that' is often optional. In French, you must use a subordinator (which could be qu', que, qui, etc.) for every nested level. In coordinated structures, while 'que' is repeated after 'et' or 'ou', other conjunctions like 'quand' or 'puisque' are replaced by 'que' rather than repeated.
Applying the subjunctive to every verb in the chain regardless of the trigger.
Je doute qu'il sache que nous soyons là.Je doute qu'il sache que nous sommes là.While 'attraction modale' exists, standard French requires you to check the trigger for each specific clause. 'Savoir que' usually takes the indicative unless the doubt from the main clause fully colors the entire thought.
Repeating 'si' instead of using 'que' in a coordinated condition.
S'il pleut et si tu n'as pas de parapluie, reste ici.S'il pleut et que tu n'aies pas de parapluie, reste ici.Repeating si is correct and common. In careful writing, the second 'si' is often replaced by que, and the traditional choice after 'et que' is the subjunctive. The indicative is also accepted today.
How It Connects
Learn This First
Complex sentence embedding is an advanced skill that requires managing multiple layers of subordination. To learn this, you must understand how different connectors (relative, causal, or concessive) trigger specific moods (indicative vs. subjunctive) and how the sequence of tenses (concordance des temps) maintains logical flow across several nested clauses.
- Belief verbs: indicative or subjunctive depending on certainty
Deeply embedded clauses often involve verbs of opinion or belief that dictate whether the nested subordinate clause must use the indicative or subjunctive mood.
Level 3 - dont (proposition enchâssée)Dont Spanning a Longer Embedded Structure
Understanding how relative pronouns like 'dont' function within longer, more complex structures is essential for managing the syntax of nested sentences.
Level 5 - Sequence of tenses in reported speech
Complex embedding requires a good grasp of the sequence of tenses to ensure that all nested actions are chronologically and grammatically aligned with the main clause.
Level 4