rằng
That (Introducing a Clause)
Rằng is a formal word meaning 'that', used to link a main clause to the specific content of an action or thought.
How It Works
In Vietnamese, rằng functions as a complementiser equivalent to the English 'that'. It explicitly marks the boundary of an embedded clause, adding a tone of objective reporting, clarity, or formal declaration.
Key Characteristics:
- Trigger Verbs: Rằng typically follows specific categories of verbs, including verbs of speaking (nói, kể, khẳng định), thinking or believing (nghĩ, tin, cho), and perceiving (thấy, nghe). Note the highly frequent fixed phrase Hold The View That, which operates almost as a compound verb meaning 'to assume', 'to opine', or 'to argue that' in journalism and academic writing.
- Register: Rằng primarily belongs to the formal, written, or literary register. It is highly frequent in journalism, academic essays, and formal speeches, but sounds unnaturally stiff in casual conversation.
- The Spoken Alternative: In everyday speech, native speakers naturally use To Be as the complementiser, or simply omit it entirely.
- The Combination 'rằng là': Speakers frequently combine both words into rằng là (e.g., Tôi nghĩ rằng là...) for emphasis, clarity, or simply as a conversational filler. However, using rằng là in formal writing is widely considered redundant and poor stylistic practice.
- Grammar Rules: It must be followed by a full declarative clause. You cannot use it to introduce a simple noun phrase.
The 'That' Trap:
Because rằng translates to 'that', English speakers frequently make the mistake of using it for relative clauses (e.g., 'The book that I read'). Rằng cannot be used this way. Vietnamese uses Relative Clause With mà for relative clauses. Furthermore, unlike the English 'that' which is strictly for indirect speech, rằng is frequently used to introduce direct speech in modern Vietnamese, often followed by a colon and quotation marks (e.g., Giám đốc khẳng định rằng: "Chúng tôi sẽ thành công.").
Compound Conjunctions:
Rằng is also frequently used to form compound conjunctions expressing concessions or apprehensions, such as tuy rằng / dù rằng (although / even though) and I Am Afraid That / sợ rằng (afraid that / fear that).
Common Myths Debunked:
It is often mistakenly taught that rằng is a Northern dialect word while là is Southern. While it is primarily a difference of Spoken And Written Register, geography does play a minor role, as Northern speakers use rằng slightly more often in spoken conversation than Southern speakers. Furthermore, while often viewed as a pure grammatical particle today, historically rằng was a verb meaning 'to say', a usage that survives in idioms like chẳng nói chẳng rằng (didn't say a word) and in literary contexts (like Truyện Kiều) where it frequently acts as a standalone reporting verb to introduce direct speech (e.g., Nàng rằng: "..." meaning "She said: '...'").
Examples (4)
- Tôi nghĩ rằng anh ấy sẽ không đến.
I think that he will not come.
Word by Word: I think that older brother that will not arrive.
A standard formal sentence using a verb of cognition (nghĩ).
- Kinh nghiệm cho ta thấy rằng ta phải hành động gấp rút.
Experience shows us that we must act urgently.
Word by Word: Experience give us see that we must act urgent.
Demonstrates the highly formal, academic register where 'rằng' is most natural.
- Chị ấy nói rằng dự án này sẽ thành công.
She said that this project will succeed.
Word by Word: Older sister that say that project this will succeed.
Following a verb of communication (nói) to introduce reported speech.
- Chúng tôi tin chắc chắn rằng giải pháp này là tốt nhất.
We firmly believe that this solution is the best.
Word by Word: We believe certain that solution this is best.
Attaching to an adjective expressing certainty (chắc chắn).
Common Mistakes
Using 'rằng' in casual, everyday speech.
Mình nghĩ rằng hôm nay trời sẽ mưa.Mình nghĩ (là) hôm nay trời sẽ mưa.Because learners directly translate 'that' from English, they often force 'rằng' into casual conversations, making their speech sound unnaturally stiff. Native speakers typically use 'là' or drop the complementiser entirely in speech.
Placing 'rằng' before a simple noun phrase instead of a complete clause.
Họ thông báo rằng sự thay đổi lịch trình.Họ thông báo rằng lịch trình sẽ thay đổi.'Rằng' must be followed by a full declarative clause (Subject + Predicate). It cannot directly introduce a simple noun phrase.
The 'Copula Trap': Using 'rằng' as the verb 'to be'.
Tôi rằng sinh viên.Tôi là sinh viên.Because 'rằng' can replace 'là' when functioning as the complementiser 'that', learners sometimes mistakenly assume it can also replace 'là' when it functions as the verb 'to be'. 'Rằng' CANNOT be used as a copula verb.
How It Connects
Learn This First
To understand 'rằng' as a complementiser, learners should first be familiar with how Vietnamese links verbs of cognition or speech to clauses using 'là'. 'Rằng' serves a similar function but is typically used in more formal or written contexts. Familiarity with basic sentence structure and existing speech-linking patterns like 'nói rằng' or 'nghĩ là' is necessary to grasp how 'rằng' functions as a bridge to a full statement.
Related Patterns
- nghĩ làThink That
Demonstrates the everyday spoken alternative to 'nghĩ rằng'.
Level 1 - làTo Be
While primarily the copula 'to be', 'là' is the standard, natural choice for a complementiser in everyday spoken Vietnamese.
Level 1 - Spoken And Written Register
Understanding the difference between spoken and written registers is crucial for knowing when to use 'rằng' versus 'là'.
Level 5
Learn Next
Patterns that build on this one.