meN-...-i (berulang)
Repeated or Intensive -i
The meN-...-i pattern is used in formal Malay to form transitive verbs. A key function is indicating that an action is done repeatedly or intensely, alongside its roles in marking location or causing a state.
How It Works
The meN-...-i circumfix is a versatile tool in Standard Malay. Crucially, all active verbs with the meN-...-i circumfix are transitive, meaning they must take a direct object. Because they are transitive, they can all be passivized (e.g., changing active menghadiahi to passive dihadiahi using the di-...-i passive form). (Note: Do not confuse this suffix with base roots that naturally end in 'i', like menari, which are often intransitive).
1. Repeated Action (Iterative): It indicates that an action is performed repeatedly or intensely on an object. For example, memukul (to hit) becomes memukuli (to hit repeatedly), and mencium (to kiss) becomes menciumi (to kiss repeatedly). Note: This specific usage is heavily influenced by Indonesian and is not highly productive in Standard Malaysian Malay. To express repeated actions, verb reduplication (e.g., memukul-mukul) is the more natural and common choice in Malaysia.
2. Locative Focus: It indicates that the object is the location or destination of the action. For example, menanami means to plant at a specific location.
3. Applying or Supplying (Membubuh / Mengenakan): When attached to a noun, it means to apply or supply that noun to the object. For example, air (water) becomes mengairi (to irrigate/supply water to), and garam (salt) becomes menggarami (to apply salt to).
4. Causative Function: It can attach to adjectives or nouns to mean 'causing a state'. For example, baik (good) becomes membaiki (to repair/cause to be good).
5. Indirect Object Shift (Recipient Focus): A major function is to make the recipient of an action the direct object. For these verbs of transfer, meN-...-i takes an animate direct object (known in Malaysian school grammar as Objek Tepat, the recipient, e.g., menghadiahi Ali), while the inanimate item becomes the secondary object (Objek Sipi). Conversely, meN-...-kan takes an inanimate direct object (Objek Tepat, the theme/item, e.g., menghadiahkan basikal). This is a key part of -kan vs -i viewpoint choices. (Note: A major exception in prescriptive school grammar involves the root words beri (give) and ajar (teach). Formal school grammar strictly prefers memberi and mengajar for animate recipients, and memberikan and mengajarkan for inanimate themes. Note the spelling rule for beri: the double 'i' is dropped (memberii → memberi), so it actually contains the -i suffix despite its appearance).
6. Emotion / Psychological State: It turns adjectives or nouns of emotion into transitive verbs directed at a stimulus (e.g., suka → menyukai, cinta → mencintai, hormat → menghormati).
7. Preposition Replacement (Penggantian Kata Sendi Nama): Syntactically, the -i suffix often absorbs and replaces prepositions (such as di, ke, kepada, akan, or terhadap). This is the underlying mechanism that turns an intransitive verb + preposition into a transitive verb. For example, masuk ke bilik becomes memasuki bilik, and marah akan Ali becomes memarahi Ali.
8. Morphological Rules:
- Follows standard meN- prefix nasalization rules.
- If the root ends in a consonant, add -i directly.
- If the root ends in a vowel, the spelling remains -i (temu → menemui).
- Crucial Rule: Roots ending in 'i' generally avoid the -i suffix altogether. Instead, they either take the -kan suffix (e.g., ganti → menggantikan, not menggantii) or just use the meN- prefix alone (e.g., isi → mengisi).
9. Register: This form is primarily found in formal Malay. In casual conversation, speakers often drop the -i suffix.
Examples (6)
- Pencuri itu memukuli mangsanya tanpa belas kasihan.
The thief hit his victim repeatedly without mercy.
Word by Word: Thief that [prefix]-hit-[suffix] victim-his without compassion pity.
The suffix -i here indicates an iterative aspect, meaning the action of hitting (memukul) was done repeatedly.
- Kanak-kanak itu melempari anjing liar dengan batu.
The children threw stones repeatedly at the stray dog.
Word by Word: Child-child that [prefix]-throw-[suffix] dog wild with stone.
The verb 'melempari' shows that the action of throwing was done multiple times at the target (the dog).
- Ibu menciumi pipi bayinya.
The mother kissed her baby's cheeks repeatedly.
Word by Word: Mother [prefix]-kiss-[suffix] cheek baby-her.
Adding -i to 'mencium' (to kiss) changes the meaning to kissing repeatedly or showering with kisses.
- Petani itu menanami ladangnya dengan jagung.
The farmer is planting his field with corn.
Word by Word: Farmer that [prefix]-plant-[suffix] field-his with corn.
The suffix -i shows the locative action of planting at the field, making the location (ladang) the direct object.
- Ibu menghadiahi adik sebuah buku.
Mother presented my younger sibling with a book.
Word by Word: Mother [prefix]-gift-[suffix] younger-sibling a-fruit book.
This shows the 'Recipient Focus'. The person receiving the gift (adik) is the direct object, so -i is used instead of -kan.
- Pelajar itu sangat menghormati gurunya.
The student deeply respects his teacher.
Word by Word: Student that very [prefix]-respect-[suffix] teacher-his.
Here, the meN-...-i circumfix turns the noun 'hormat' (respect) into a transitive verb directed at a stimulus (the teacher), demonstrating its use with psychological states.
Common Mistakes
Adding -i to roots that already end in the letter 'i'.
Dia menggantii tayar keretanya.Dia menggantikan tayar keretanya.Roots ending in 'i' (like 'ganti') generally avoid the -i suffix. Instead, they take the -kan suffix or just use the meN- prefix alone (like 'mengisi').
Confusing the locative -i with the causative -kan.
Saya memasukkan bilik itu.Saya memasuki bilik itu.'Memasukkan' means to put something inside (causative movement of an object), while 'memasuki' means to enter a place (locative).
Using meN-...-i verbs without a direct object.
Dia sedang membaiki.Dia sedang membaiki kereta itu.Active verbs with the meN-...-i circumfix are transitive, so the object is normally stated. It is dropped only when the context makes it obvious.
How It Connects
Learn This First
To understand the use of meN-...-i for repeated actions, learners must first be familiar with the meN- prefix for active verbs and the basic function of the -i suffix. Knowledge of how Malay generally handles repeated actions (such as through verb reduplication) provides useful context for why this specific suffix is used to indicate intensive or iterative movement.
- -iBasic -i Target Marking
Understanding the basic locative or target-marking function of the -i suffix is necessary before learning its specialized use for repeated actions.
Level 2 - Verbal reduplication
The concept of repetition in Malay verbs is often introduced through reduplication; understanding how Malay marks aspectual repetition helps contextualize the intensive function of -i.
Level 2
Related Patterns
- meN-...-iLocative MeN-...-i
The locative function is one of the primary roles of the meN-...-i circumfix.
Level 3 - -kan / -iChoosing -kan or -i
Choosing between -kan and -i often depends on whether the focus is on the object being moved or the recipient/location.
Level 3 - meN-...-kanCausative MeN-...-kan
The -kan suffix is often contrasted with -i; -kan often focuses on moving an object, while -i focuses on the location or target.
Level 3 - meN-Active Transitive Verbs with MeN-
The meN-...-i circumfix follows the same nasalization rules as the basic meN- prefix.
Level 2 - di-...-iPassive Locative or Target Form
This is the passive counterpart of the meN-...-i active form.
Level 4